SU Home  |   Newhouse Home  |   Events  |   Research links  |   Contact Us  |   Home
Header Header
» MORE EVENTS
Recently on Lawbeat
RSS-Subscribe RSS Feed   |   › Most Recent Postings
Sun, May 10, 2009
LawBeat on hiatus
Why has this blog been so quiet? Two reasons: Until today, I've been in a long, dark tunnel of work, more intense than even past end-of-semester crunches. But on top of that, I've been debating whether to continue producing LawBeat. The debate is over. I've decided to quit it, and I owe my reader(s) an explanation. I also can legitimately hold out...
Posted at: 04:34:15PM
Sun, April 26, 2009
Painting oral arguments as mere politics
Student post
Dana Milbank's April 23 column "The Supremes Sing...
Posted at: 04:07:13PM
» MORE BLOG POSTINGS
» BLOG ARCHIVES
•  About the program
•  Legal studies minor
•  Careers in legal journalism
•  Research links
•  Contact us
•  Legal reporting fellowships
•  Blog
blog Comments
RSS-Subscribe RSS Feed   |   › Most Recent Postings
Original Post:
Greenhouse and Fidell's last laugh
The New York Times
Wed, July 02, 2008
Linda Greenhouse has taken heat for her husband's legal expertise in military law -- specifically for his advocacy in causes that have come before the Court. But on today's front page, barely two weeks before her retirement, Greenhouse nails a good story thanks to that familial connection.

Over the weekend, Greenhouse says in an e-mail, her husband, Eugene Fidell, spotted a blog post that claimed the Supreme Court's majority decision in Kennedy v. Louisiana erred when it tallied how many jurisdictions have statutes that would punish the rape of a child with the death penalty. The tally, in Justice Anthony Kennedy's controversial majority opinion, left out military law. Dwight Sullivan, a civilian appellate defense counsel in the Air Force Appellate Defense Division, noticed the omission. Sullivan blogged on Saturday night at his CAAFlog blog that in 2006, Congress revised the Uniform Code of Military Justice to punish child-rape with death. The title of his brief but authoritative post says it all: "The Supremes dis the military justice system." Greenhouse wrote in an e-mail, in response to my questions about the origin of the story, that she and Fidell had different takes on what to do with the information:

His instinct as a lawyer was to bring the information to the attention of the Louisiana attorney general's office. My instinct was that it was a great story. I won.

Well, they both won, since the Louisiana AG surely can't miss an above-the-fold front-pager that says a key factual underpinning in a close decision that went against his client was in error -- and hadn't been found by any of the parties or amici that briefed the case (or by any of the reporters who covered it). As for Sullivan, his serious, substantive blog gets some deserved notoriety -- and even a rare link from the text of a Times story (rather than just linking from sidebar material).
Posted at 08:10 AM
There are 2 comments to this post:
commented:
im willing to bet these types of errors happen all the time...not good.

Nick

photos on canvas
Posted Thu, April 30, 2009 at 02:11 PM
Pauly commented:
The tip of the iceburg
Makes you wonder just how many similar errors are made in this type of case law.

Pauly

Green lasers rulz
Posted Mon, July 07, 2008 at 05:23 AM
SU Home  |   Newhouse Home  |   Events  |   Research links  |   Contact Us  |   Home
© 2009 S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications, Syracuse University
This site was made possible in part by a grant from Carnegie Corporation of New York.
The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the author.
Web site design and programming by ThreeOneFive Design